Sunday 13 January 2008

Gordon Brown


I've just been reading Gordon Brown's biography, by Tom Bower. Bower is chiefly known for his biographies of the likes of Tiny Rowlands and Robert Maxwell, which were very scholarly and well-researched. This one doesn't quite match those standards - his sources aren't noted, and his own (fairly right wing) opinions often peer out from behind his supposedly objective veil. That said, he convincingly demonstrates that Brown is, at best, a conniving, power-hungry, mendacious dissembler - and at worst an unstable megolamaniac liar.


To take one example: Brown's commitment - as opposed to his achievement - to eradicating poverty has always endeared him to those who wanted to 'vote Blair, get Brown', imagining that there was going to be some sort of quasi-socialist state slipped in by the back door. Unfortunately, the book - and a number of others - have shown that a) Brown was as deeply important to, and as much an architect of, New Labour as much as Tony Blair ever was, and that b) although he was in theory committed to reducing poverty as an almost personal crusade, his methods - working families tax credits, stealth taxes etc - resulted in confusion amongst those supposed to administer and receive the benefits, increased expenditure - overall tax rates rose for all - and most importantly signally failed in their main purpose (two authorative recent studies showed that the gap between rich and poor had widened in the past 10 years, and that those in poverty have a lower reading/writing attainment than 10 years ago, meaning that their chances of escaping poverty are greatly lessened).


One of the chief reasons for his failure was his inability to listen to the advice of senior civil servants - who, because they disagreed with him, had to go - and to continue ploughing ahead when in practise, e.g with tax credits, his schemes were obviously failing him. Alastair Campbell is generally thought to be the one who labelled Brown as having 'psychological flaws'. As more people look at his history, and how it's now coming home to roost - the credit crisis that results from a deliberate policy instigated in order to finance his changes to the economy, the criminal pensions changes which have left many working class people financially bereft, to name but two - and how he responds to crises - that hurt scowl, appearing to not comprehend how somebody can possibly disagree with him and, even worse, challenge him - we can begin to agree with Campbell; and, as more of us do, the less his chances of survival.


So, here's a prediction; a General Election by May, and a hung parliament.
(Photo by didby graham on Flickr)

5 comments:

vikki hill said...

More important than all this government talk - we want to see your photo of you smoking a pipe.
Si and Vik x

Anonymous said...

i can't think of another politician who would fall outside your "at best/at worst" description of Gordon Brown.Parliamentary politics are dead .Rather than waste your energy on rants about Brown or any subsequent leaders you should turn your attention to the new political forum-the internet ,at present a tool of neo-conservative anti-liberal americans who covertly subsume themselves into the fabric of our everyday lives through seemingly innocent media as facebook etc.Oh and more pictures of editor with pipe please.

Johnny2 said...

Thanks anonymous,

I tend to agree with you about parliamentary politics, and about Facebook etc - I wish I didn't rant so much (it's not good for the blood pressure) but I guess it just reflects my anger at my own stupidity for putting so much faith in them in the first place.

The pipe pictures have been ceremoniously burned,
John

Anonymous said...

give the man a break hes only been in the job 6 months. ok blair made some mistakes but its not gordons fault there were floods and the credit crunch is a us problem and now hes got hains mess to deal with. dont know how old you are but i remember the torys, do you want to go back to that level of sleaze i dont. my house is worth 4 times what i paid for it now, why dont you say give the guy a break, and in may dont be fooled into voting cameran.

Johnny2 said...

Gordon was effectively in power, with Blair, since 1997; he locked the Treasury into his spending plans, devised the PPP and PFI initiatives, and in 2001 took fiscal decisions that encouraged the credit industry to grow - so not entirely the US's fault...

I'm 44, and remember the Tories well; I voted against them, argued against them and marched against them. However, they're not in power now, new Labour are - and my point is that they have been much more Tory than the Tories were, having achieved many things that the Tories could only dream of. And Tory sleaze was generally individual slimeballs, not financial sleight-of-hand on a governmental scale, the wholesale corruption of the Civil Service ethos, and the creation of personal and national debt - we're going to be paying off PFI deals for around 30 years - on a monumental scale.

No, I won't be voting Cameron, and I don't think he'll win. In my view we're next heading for a hung parliament, which might be our only way of heading off the wilder excesses of this megolamaniac leader and party.